This publication is outcome of the research and analysis of migration flows from Ukraine into Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia influenced by war in Ukraine. In 4 national studies, researchers analyse the situation in 4 countries including asylum immigration, labour and bussiness immigration and student visa. Also, researchers focused on special governmental schemes targeted to facilitate immigration of vulnerable or other groups of Ukrainians into V4 countries if such schemes existed or exist. Finally, the publication includes join recommendations for governments and stakeholders from all V4 countries on better and flexible managment and facilitation of Ukrainian immigration into V4 countries.
National report has been prepared under the project co-financed by the EU: Best practice in determination and implementation of durable solutions for separated children in Europe. Report has been prepared in cooperation with national advisory commitee, in which the State authorities were represented.
In relation to current refugee crisis, large number of separated children has arrived to Europe. These children are not accompanied with parents or any other responsible person. International organizations and monitoring bodies (UNHCR, UNICEF, GRETA) regularly reminds on the risks these children face in relation to facilitation of basic services and protection against expulsion and trafficking in human beings.
According to the European Commission, the "determination and implementation of durable solution" is one of the main forms of common european protection approach on separated children.
Durable solution is permanent solution, determined in shortest possible time after the arrival of child, which is subjected to review and which takes into account best interest of child, including assessment of several factors such as family of the child; citizenship/nationality; religion; culture; safety of the child including protection against trafficking in human beings; vulnerability and other protection needs, including child's own opinions and abilities.
Slovakia has a well developed infrastructure for separated children, including system of care, which can provide protection for the child, future and care. Based on this existing system, we advise to the State to include several places for separated children within the relocation and resettlement scheme, for which such participation will be in their best interest and who will be placed into children foster care in Medzilaborce, where their integration can start.
The coaching manual is developed under the project “Coaching-Innovative support for better integration of refugees”, Grundtvig Program – Learning Partnerships, a project implemented between August 2013-July 2015 by Association Pro Refugiu Romania in partnership with Caritas Prague Czech Republic and Human Rights League Slovakia.
The manual is designed to provide professionals working already with refugees as social counsellors, psychologists, cultural mediators with a practical, enjoyable way to learn about coaching and they can use it to help refugees.
Coaching approach is a very innovative topic used in various domains in helping people to learn how to increase their self- awareness, improve confidence in dealing with various obstacles and challenges in their current life, increase motivation. There is a strong need for a new approach to refugees’ assistance – one that takes in account to reduce vulnerability over time, actively promoting refugees’ ability to support themselves in dealing with current integration problems, rather than a simple counselling.
The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European fund for integration of third countries nationals. Solidarity and management of migration flows.
The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European fund for integration of third countries nationals. Solidarity and management of migration flows.
This National report is a part of the project “Practices in interviewing immigrants: legal implications” funded by the Visegrad Fund. The project is realized with Slovak Human Rights League, The Hungarian Helsinki Committee, Czech Organization for Aid to Refugees and Ukrainian Caritas.
Autori národných štúdií Practices in interviewing immigrants: legal implications sú expertmi cudzineckého práva: za Poľsko: Maja Tobiasz, za Ukrajinu: Kristina Jarošová, za Maďarsko: Orsolya Szantai Vecsera, za Česko: Hana Franková, za Slovensko: Zuzana Števulová.
Národné správy sú k dispozícii na webstránkach všetkých piatich partnerov výskumu:
http://www.hrl.sk/publications
http://www.opu.cz/cz/article/135
http://helsinki.hu/Menekultek_es_kulfoldiek/Projektek/htmls/914
http://www.hfhrpol.waw.pl/uchodzcy/en/publikacje-dla-cudzoziemcow/practi...
http://caritas-uzhgorod.org/uk/migraciyniproekti/116-2011-09-28-14-33-39...
alebo priamy odkaz:
Practices in interviewing immigrants POLAND
Practices_in_interviewing_immigrants_Hungary
Practices_interviewing_immigrants_Czech_rep
Practices_interviewing_immigrants_Slovakia
Practices_interviewing_immigrants_Ukraine_Caritas
„Detention and alternatives to detention in the Slovak Republic – National report“ includes the description of the applicable legislation in 2010 and 2011, assessment of its application, challenges, barriers and concerns, and also highlights the upcoming changes to legislation since January 2012. The basic overview of the asylum system, detention legislation, implications on the asylum seekers, statistics and the assessment and main findings are included as well. The main recommendations for further development of the system are included in the document “National Policy Brief” that is part of this report.
Authors: Miroslava Mittelmannová, Zuzana Števulová
Project: „Steps to Freedom. Monitoring detention and promoting alternatives to detention of asylum seekers in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic”
Project co-financed by the European Commission, European Refugee Fund
Participants in the project of the Visegrad Fund have extensive experience of the crucial issues studied and can draw on personal observation. We have repeatedly noted complaints about the conduct and quality of interpreting during various proceedings and in foreigners’ contacts with the state organs. We ask whether the existing legal norms and their practical application sufficiently guarantee respect for the fundamental rights of foreigners, as regards proper and lawful interpreting during the proceedings. Furthermore, we raise the question of the risks other foreigners are exposed to, due to persistent inadequacies identified by the observers.
The findings presented in the study are drawn from the observations and experience of all the project partners and reflect the current state of practice in the years 2010-2011. In our findings and recommendations we do not distinguish the type of public service administrator. The term interview is used to mean any type of contact between state organs and foreigners, given that the problems which are mentioned appear in all state institutions, though in differing degrees. For institutional specifications see the national studies.
This comparative study addresses identified problems in interpreting in V4 and Ukraine and offers recommendations for all the stakeholders in contact with immigrants.
This handbook is written for all who come into contact with immigrants and who aim to understand them. Principally, the information here may be useful for state administrators, members of the police, interpreters, judges, legal representatives, and workers from the non-governmental sector. But it may be a source of inspiration for members of other professions also. They will find here guidelines for conducting an interview: information on the various methods of posing questions, on description, on human memory, and on the specifics of interpreting and intercultural communication.
Helena Tužinská’s book encourages a thoughtful approach to what seems a straightforward encounter, the open interview. Writing in an accessible style, she describes how a routine use of language, or a schematic notion of how human memory functions, can be obstacles to knowledge. Her book is a valuable demonstration of the fact that analytical acuteness and respect for the other person need not be mutually exclusive alternatives. I therefore warmly recommend it to social scientists and all who use the interview as a means towards understanding the life experiences of others. Zuzana Kusá, sociologist